Call Us
Find Us
Estate Litigation Blog
Estate Litigation: Using Technology to Adapt
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: June 23, 2020
Here are some of the ways in which our profession has adapted and embraced the use of technology since the onset of COVID-19.
Suspension of Limitation Periods and Statutory Deadlines Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
by Lisa Fenech, Published: April 24, 2020
The Courts and COVID-19
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: April 15, 2020
As individuals and businesses have been required to adapt and adjust as a result of COVID-19, so too has the Court been required to modernize and innovate. Click the title to read more.
Virtual Witnessing of Wills
by Rob Levesque, Published: April 13, 2020
Our colleague Liza Saad has written a blog addressing the Lieutant Governor's recent Emergency Order dealing with the virutual witnessing of wills during the COVID 19 pandemic.
We are open during COVID 19 pandemic
by Rob Levesque, Published: April 03, 2020
Our firm is open and our lawyers and staff are working remotely to address your estate, trust and guardianship litigation issues during the COVID 19 pandemic.
Felice Kirsh: Not every issue is worthy of a passing of accounts
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: November 18, 2019
Read Felice Kirsh's article in Advocate Daily, which discusses some of the factors that a beneficiary may consider before requiring a trustee to pass his/her accounts. You can find it here.
Felice Kirsh discusses the importance of record-keeping by estate trustees
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: November 09, 2019
Read Felice Kirsh's article in Advocate Daily about the importance of estate trustees keeping detailed records and receipts. You can find it here.
Sender Tator on Dependant Support cases and "Egregious Conduct"
by Rob Levesque, Published: October 17, 2019
Sender Tator was recently quoted in the Law Times on the issue of dependant support applications involving "egregious conduct" by dependant spouses. Read the article here.
Improper Conduct and Dependant Support
by Rob Levesque, Published: October 10, 2019
This blog by our colleague Liza Saad examines the case of Webb v. Belway, 2019 ONSC 4602, and its implication for dependant support cases where there are allegations of misconduct against the dependant spouse.
Felice Kirsh on why DIY wills are a recipe for disaster
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: September 24, 2019
Read Felice Kirsh's article in Advocate Daily about the risks of using a do-it-yourself will kit. You can find it here.
Felice Kirsh, Jordan Oelbaum, and Sender Tator named to Best Lawyers 2020
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: September 09, 2019
Felice C. Kirsh, Jordan D. Oelbaum, and Sender B. Tator were recently recognized by their peers as three of the Best Lawyers in Canada for the year 2020 in the "Best Lawyers in Canada" survey for the specialty area of Trusts and Estates.
Felice Kirsh discusses how lawyers should prepare their clients for mediation
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: July 16, 2019
Read Felice Kirsh's article in Advocate Daily titled "Discuss settlement range with client prior to mediation." You can find it here.
Felice Kirsh discusses the benefits of evaluative mediators
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: July 02, 2019
Read Felice Kirsh's article in Advocate Daily about the benefits of evaluative versus facilitative mediators. You can find it here.
Felice Kirsh on "Is my estate dispute suited for mediation?"
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: May 16, 2019
Read Felice Kirsh's article in Advocate Daily about which estate and trust disputes are best-suited for mediation. You can find it here.
Felice Kirsh discusses the benefits of mediating estate disputes
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: April 15, 2019
Read Felice Kirsh's article in Advocate Daily about how estate mediation can mitigate risk, save time and money. You can find it here.
Presentation at the MCBNA
by Lisa Fenech, Published: April 03, 2019
Maltese Canadian Business Network Association
Top 10 Wills, Trusts and Estates Boutique
by Robin Spurr, Published: January 25, 2019
Schnurr Kirsh Oelbaum Tator LLP has once again been named as one of the top wills, trusts and estates boutiques in the country by Canadian Lawyer Magazine. We are grateful for the recognition from our peers.
No Two-Year Limitation Period for Passing of Accounts
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: December 10, 2018
The Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that there is no two-year limitation period to commence an application to pass accounts or to file a notice of objection to accounts.
Limitation Period on a Will Challenge: Shannon v. Hrabovsky
by Lisa Fenech, Published: November 16, 2018
How much time does a will challenger have to commence proceedings? The safest answer is: within two years of the date of death of the deceased. If a will challenger wants to commence proceedings after two years of the date of death, they will need to convince a court that the principle of discoverability applies in will challenges and that it applies to the circumstances of their case.
Make a Will Month
by Robin Spurr, Published: November 12, 2018
“There is no good reason not to have a will — any time is a good time to make one,”
Felice Kirsh discusses the perils of finding heirs
by Robin Spurr, Published: October 03, 2018
Read Felice Kirsh's article in Advocate Daily about identifying and tracking down beneficiaries. You can find it here.
The partners at SKOT LLP are Lexpert-ranked
by Robin Spurr, Published: September 25, 2018
The new 2019 Lexpert rankings are out!
Probate and Privacy
by Rob Levesque, Published: August 25, 2018
When you die, the person who you have appointed as your estate trustee will have to file an application for a certificate of appointment -- commonly called "applying for probate" -- and in that application they will have to divulge the value of your estate, and the individuals whom you have chosen as your beneificiaries. That application will be filed with the court and as such the information contained in it will be publicly available for anyone to access.
Buzz Aldrin Guardianship Dispute & the Importance of Planning for Incapacity
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: June 26, 2018
Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin is suing his two children for improperly taking control of his finances. His children had previously brought a Court Application to have him declared incapable, and to have them appointed as his guardians for property.
As this litigation is unfolding, it is a good time to consider the importance of planning for future incapacity, and some benefits - and risks - of making Continuing Powers of Attorney for Property.
The expensive consequences of being unreasonable in estate litigation
by Robin Spurr, Published: June 21, 2018
The recent case of Newlands Estate v. Newlands Estate highlights the need for proportionality in litigation, and the expensive consequences if you are not.
Legally Valid Gifts
by Lisa Fenech, Published: April 04, 2018
If a friend gave you a cheque and later passed away before you had the opportunity to cash that cheque, would you feel entitled to the amount that the cheque provided for?
Powers of Attorney - Common Myths
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: March 16, 2018
Last November was the Ontario Bar Association's "Make a Will Month", and I spoke at Barbara Frum Library about the benefits of having a will. While a will is an important and effective tool for directing how your property is to be distributed following your death, powers of attorney enable you to authorize someone else to act on your behalf with respect to managing your property and/or making decisions concerning your health and personal care.
I recently read an article that contained inaccurate information about powers of attorney, and decided to clarify a few common myths.
Costs in Estate Litigation
by Robin Spurr, Published: February 28, 2018
One of the questions we hear most often as estate litigators is “will I get my legal costs back?”. It is very common in litigation for one party or both parties to feel that the litigation would have been unnecessary but for the actions of the other party, and at the end of the day, they want the other party to pay the costs incurred in the litigation.
Capacity to reconcile or divorce
by Rob Levesque, Published: January 31, 2018
In the recent case of Chuvalo v. Chuvalo, 2018 ONSC 311, the Court was asked to decide whether George Chuvalo, the famous Canadian boxer, had the capacity to reconcile with his wife.
What’s the “issue” with not updating your will?
by Matthew Rendely, Published: May 16, 2017
How not regularly updating your will can have unexpected consequences.
Top 5 Wills, Trusts and Estates Boutiques in Canada
by Robin Spurr, Published: January 10, 2017
We are very pleased to announce that Schnurr Kirsh Oelbaum Tator LLP has once again been recognized as one of the Top 5 Wills, Trusts and Estates boutiques in Canada. We appreciate the ongoing support of our peers in the legal community across Canada, and look forward to continuing to serve our clients in an effective, pragmatic and personable manner.
Mutual Wills v. Mirror Wills
by Robin Spurr, Published: December 05, 2016
A commentary on the mutual will doctrine and how it was applied in two recent cases, with very different results.
Costs in Will Challenge Litigation
by Rob Levesque, Published: September 11, 2016
It is well-settled that in estate litigation the unsuccessful party must generally pay some of the successful party’s costs – this is often referred to as the “loser pays principle”.
Importantly however, the loser pays principle is subject to certain exceptions that are unique to estate litigation. For instance, where there is a genuine dispute about the validity of a will, even an unsuccessful party may be awarded costs out of the estate. The rationale for this exception is that it is important for the courts to give effect to valid wills that reflect the intentions of competent testators.
That doesn’t mean that the parties to every will challenge should expect that they will receive their costs from the estate, as illustrated by the recent case of Sweetnam v. Lesage. In that case, the testator had left a will disinheriting his daughter, and leaving the entirety of his substantial estate to his fishing buddies. At the conclusion of a long trial, the court found that the deceased suffered from delusions that caused him to disinherit his daughter. As a result, the deceased’s will was declared invalid, and his entire estate passed to his daughter. The fishing buddies received nothing.
When it came to decide the issues of costs, the Court applied the loser pays principle in ordering the unsuccessful party to pay a portion of the daughter’s legal costs. Moreover, the Court refused to allow the unsuccessful party to recover any of her own costs from the estate. The Court acknowledged that an unsuccessful party may be awarded costs out of the estate in appropriate cases, but noted that in this case the unsuccessful party had rejected a number of reasonable settlement offers made by the daughter. Furthermore, since the daughter received the entire estate as a result of the will having been declared invalid, ordering the unsuccessful party’s costs out of the estate would be the same as ordering the daughter to pay the costs personally.
Estate Planning - Digital Assets
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: September 02, 2016
This article looks at "digital assets" and how they may be factored into estate planning.
2016 Amendments to the Income Tax Act – Graduated Rate Estates and Qualified Disability Trusts
by Mitchell Rattner, Published: June 06, 2016
Amendments to the Income Tax Act that came into effect on January 1, 2016 require testamentary trusts to be taxed at the highest marginal rate, but for two exceptions: the Graduated Rate Estate and the Qualified Disability Trust.
Capacity to Enter into Contracts
by Robin Spurr, Published: April 25, 2016
Incapable adults can be vulnerable to scam artists and people seeking to take advantage of them for their own personal gain. There are legal ramifications for this, and steps you can take to prevent it.
Court of Appeal overturns "racist will" decision
by Rob Levesque, Published: March 08, 2016
Last year we blogged about Spence v. BMO Trust Company, a case that was causing a sitr in the estates and trusts bar.
In Spence, the testator made a will that explicity disinherited his daughter. The daugher sought to set aside the will on the grounds that the testator's motives for disinheriting her were fundamentally racist: that the testator, who was black, disinherited her because he was displeased that she had conceived a chlld with a white man. The judge who heard the daughter's application accepted that the testator had been motivated by his racist views, and held that this evidence was sufficent to render the will invalid, marking the first time in canadian legal history that a will has been set aside on the basis of discriminatory views held by a testator.
The application judge's decision caused such a commotion among estates lawyers because it contradicted the well established principle of testamentary freedom -- that a testator is free to dispose of his estate as he chooses, for such reasons as he sees fit. If the application judge was correct, then it would mean that testamentary freedom is limited by the Court's view of what is or is not against "public policy".
The Court of Appeal has now weighed in on the Spence case, and has overturned the application judge's decision. In doing so, the Court reaffirmed that in Ontario, testators have the freedom to dispose of their estate as they see fit. This freedom includes the right to disinherit a child for reasons that are explicitly discriminatroy. Thus, the Court held that, even if the testator's will had explilcity referred to a discriminatory reason for disinheriting his daughter, it would not have been open to the application judge to set it aside.
Best Lawyers
by Jovan Cvejic, Published: December 23, 2015
Schnurr Kirsh Oelbaum Tator LLP is proud to announce that once again our partners have been recognized by their peers in the 2016 Edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada in the practice area of Trusts and Estates.
Costs Award Against Power of Attorney Personally
by Robin Spurr, Published: November 06, 2015
A recent Court of Appeal decision made it clear that when Attorneys for Property are faced with contentious family disputes, they must remember that their fiduciary obligation in litigation is not solely a question of financial benefit for the incapable person. Rather, the Attorney must consider what is in the person’s best interests overall, which may include mending family ties and settling at an early stage. Otherwise, unreasonable conduct could result in the Attorneys finding themselves personally liable for the legal costs.
Applications and Actions: dismissal for delay
by Robin Spurr, Published: September 19, 2015
In an effort to streamline the litigation process and free up much needed court resources, the Rules of Civil Procedure were amended as of January 1, 2015 to provide that the Registrar shall dismiss an action if it has not been set down for trial within 5 years.
Schnurr Kirsh Oelbaum Tator LLP is heading east!
by Jovan Cvejic, Published: March 06, 2015
We congratulate our friend and former colleague Susan Woodley on her judicial appointment to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
We are pleased to announce that Schnurr Kirsh Oelbaum Tator LLP will take over carriage of Susan’s Estate, Trust and Guardianship practice. We will have an additional office at 55 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario. We look forward to serving the community of Bowmanville and the County of Durham.
Spence v. BMO Trust Company: the case of the racist father
by Robin Spurr, Published: February 27, 2015
The recent decision in Spence v. BMO Trust Company raises very interesting questions about testamentary freedom and the power of the courts to remedy wills which contravene public policy.
Top 5 Wills, Trusts and Estates Firms in Canada
by Jovan Cvejic, Published: January 30, 2015
We are very excited to announce that Schnurr Kirsh Oelbaum Tator LLP has been named one of the Top 5 Boutique Wills, Trusts and Estates firms in Canada by Canadian Lawyer magazine! The list is compiled and voted on by lawyers across Canada. We are grateful to our peers for the recognition and honoured to have earned their confidence.
Quinn v. Carrigan: "No litigation outcome is inevitable"
by Rob Levesque, Published: November 15, 2014
It can be comforting to think of the law as an objective system that produces consistent, predictable results. However, judges aren't computers, and different judges can interpret the same facts and the same law in different ways, producing totally different outcomes.
It can be particularly difficult to predict the outcome of a dependant support application brought under Part V of the Succession Law Reform Act. Determining what constitutes "adequate support" of a dependant spouse or child is not an exact science, and raises questions that don't have easy answers. How do you place a value on a spouse's relationship with the deceased? How can you treat the deceased's dependants and other family members equitably, having regard to their legal and moral claims against the estate? While judges have developed various rules and principles that apply to dependant support claims, the fact remains that different judges will reach different conclusions based on the same facts and law.
The recent case of Quinn v. Carrigan 2014 ONSC 5682 is a perfect example of this phenomenon.
The late Mr. Carrigan left assets with a total value of approximately $2.4 million to his wife https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc/doc/2014/2014onsc5682/2014onsc5682.pdfand two children, and nothing to his common law spouse of eight years, Ms. Quinn. Not surprisingly, Ms. Quinn retained a lawyer and made a claim against Mr. Carrigan's estate for dependant support. Ms. Quinn's claim went to trial, and the Court concluded that she was entitled to receive the deceased's pension death benefit, worth about $1.4 million.
The deceased's wife appealed the Court's judgment to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge had erred in concluding that Ms. Quinn was entitled to the death benefit, and accordingly ordered a second trial of her dependant support claim. At the end of the second trial, the Court concluded that Ms. Quinn was entitled to a lump sum payment of $350,000.00.
Ms. Quinn appealed the second judgment to the Divisional Court. The Divisional Court held that the judge in the second trial had erred in calculating Ms. Quinn's spousal support payment. However, rather than ordering a third trial, the Divisional Court conducted its own analysis of the dependant support claim, ultimately concluding that Ms. Quinn was entitled to a lump sum payment of $750,000.00.
In the end, Ms. Quinn had three separate hearings to determine her entitlement to a share of the deceased’s estate, and got three very different results. The lesson for potential litigants is clear. As expressed by Justice Corbett, who delivered the reasons of the Divisional Court in this case: "no litigation outcome is inevitable".
What you need to know before starting a will challenge: Leibel v. Leibel
by Robin Spurr, Published: November 07, 2014
There has been a lot of buzz in the legal community recently about the case of Leibel v. Leibel (reported as Leibel v. Lewis), which was decided by the Honourable Justice Greer in August of this year. The reason for all the legal chatter is that this case clarified whether there is a limitation period on will challenges. It turns out, according to Justice Greer, that the regular two-year limitation period set out in the Limitations Act, 2002 applies equally to will challenges as it does to any other civil litigation.
Do the claims of dependants have priority over the claims of other creditors?
by Rob Levesque, Published: October 15, 2014
In the administration of any estate, one of the estate trustee's first jobs is to identify potential creditors who might advance claims against the estate. The general wisdom has always been that an estate trustee should make sure that he or she has held back sufficent funds from the estate to satisfy the claims of all potential creditors before making distributions to the beneficiaries, heirs and dependants of the estate. It may therefore come as a surprise to many lawyers that in a recent case, Grieco v. Grieco Estate, 2013 ONSC 2465, the Court held that dependant support claims have priority over the claims of potential creditors with pending, but unproven claims.
In the Grieco case, the deceased’s ex-wife had an outstanding equalization claim against the deceased’s estate which pre-dated his death. The deceased’s common law spouse and two of the deceased’s adult children bought dependant support claims against the estate. The parties settled their claims at mediation, and obtained a consent judgment providing for the distribution of lump sum equalization and dependant support payments.
The estate trustee was wary of making the payments pursuant to the consent judgment because a number of potential creditors had come forward with claims against the estate. While the claims of the creditors had yet to be proven, if the estate trustee proceeded with the distribution of the dependant support and equalization payments pursuant to the consent judgment, there would be no money left in the estate to satisfy a possible judgment against the estate by the creditors. Accordingly, the estate trustee sought the direction of the Court.
The Court held that the lump sum equalization payment to the ex-wife and the lump sum dependant support payment to the common law spouse took priority over the claims of the potential creditors. In doing so, the Court referred to section 4(1) of the Creditor’s Relief Act, 1990 and Section 2(3) of its successor legislation the the Creditor’s Relief Act, 2010. The Court held that both the 1990 Act and the current Act, “maintain the priority of support claims over virtually all other claims”, and that this priority extended to dependant support orders made pursuant to the Succession Law Reform Act. Accordingly the common law spouse was entitled to recieve her lump sum payment from the estate in priority to the potential creditors.
Furthermore, given that orders made for the support of dependants have priority over debts owing to creditors under section 2(3) of the Creditors' Relief Act; and given that a spouses’ equalization entitlement has priority over orders for the support of dependants other than children of the deceased under subsection 6(12) of the Family Law Act; the Court concluded that the ex-wife’s equalization payment also had priority over the claims of the potential creditors. The Court found that the wife was also a dependant of the estate and was entitled to receive her lump sum payment in priority to the creditors on that basis as well.
The Grieco case raises difficult issues for trustees facing competing claims by surviving spouses, dependants of the estate, and other potential creditors of the estate. While the case appears to stand for the proposition that the claims of dependants have priority over the claims of other potential creditors of the estate pursuant to the Creditor’s Relief Act, lawyers who are advising estate trustees should treat the decision with caution. There are currently no other reported cases dealing with the interaction between the Creditors' Relief Act and equalization and support claims in the estates context.
Estate Administration and Automatic Vesting
by Robin Spurr, Published: October 03, 2014
Automatic vesting is often an illusory concept and almost always comes as a surprise to the lay estate trustee. The rule as set out in the Estates Administration Act (EAA) is that real property vests in the beneficiaries three years after the death of the testator. Vesting means taking ownership of something. Sometimes a gift is vested only in interest before someone actually takes possession of it. When an interest vests, that is the moment someone has a legal claim of ownership. Once a property vests in the beneficiary, the beneficiary becomes the owner of the property even if it is still technically registered in the name of the deceased person or the estate trustee. After the property becomes vested in the beneficiary, the estate trustee is limited in what he or she can do with the property.
Elizabeth Bozek to Chair OBA program "Complex Passing of Accounts"
by Robin Spurr, Published: October 03, 2014
Elizabeth Bozek will be the Chair of the Section Program presented by the Ontario Bar Association, Estates & Trusts Section, on November 25, 2014 on "Complex Passing of Accounts". The panel will review how estate litigators should approach complicated passing of accounts by estate trustees and how to avoid the pitfalls that can come with complex estate administrations.
Jordan Oelbaum speaks about the discovery process at Osgoode Hall Law School
by Robin Spurr, Published: September 25, 2014
On September 24, 2014, Jordan Oelbaum spoke at "Managing, Mediating and Litigating Estates Disputes", a conference held at Osgoode Hall Law School. In his paper, "Discovery and Settlement in the Estate Case: Preparing for Settlement", Jordan explores the discovery and settlement processes in light of the Court's recent comments on the need for proportionality in estates cases.
Felice Kirsh speaks to financial advisors about best practices
by Rob Levesque, Published: September 18, 2014
On September 16, 2014, Felice Kirsh gave a talk to a group of financial advisors at CIBC Wood Gundy titled "Keeping the Financial Advisor Out of Litigation". Topics covered included taking instructions from clients; the importance of keeping a well-documented file; and ensuring that advice given is limited to the advisor's field of expertise.
Best Lawyers for 2015
by Rob Levesque, Published: September 17, 2014
Brian Schnurr, Felice Kirsh, Jordan Oelbaum and Sender Tator have each been recognized by their peers as being among the Best Lawyers in Canada in the specialty area of Estates and Trusts for the year 2015, in the Best Lawyers in Canada survey.
Felice Kirsh to chair conference at Osgoode Hall Law School
by Rob Levesque, Published: September 17, 2014
On Septermber 24, 2014, Felice Kirsh will chair a conference at Osgoode Hall Law School, titled "Managing, Mediating and Litigating Estates Disputes". The conference will cover all stages of an estate litigation matter, from the initial client interview, to discovery, to mediation to trial.
Parents have testamentary freedom
by Rob Levesque, Published: September 08, 2014
Felice Kirsh was recently quoted in an article on Advocatedaily.com. In "Wealthy or not, parents have testamentary freedom", Felice advises parents to consider the size of their estate and the financial situation of each child when planning their estates.
Pro Bono Students Canada's Wills Project
by Rob Levesque, Published: May 15, 2014
Sandra Schnurr recently completed another rewarding year of supervising law students in the Wills Project of Pro Bono Students Canada. These future lawyers volunteer their time to provide wills and powers of attorney to qualifying members of the public.
Leading practitioners
by Rob Levesque, Published: April 16, 2014
Brian Schnurr, Felice Kirsh, Sandra Schnurr and Jordan Oelbaum has each been recognized as a "Leading Practitioner" in the field of Estate Litigation in the 2014 edition of the Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory.
Choose a power of attorney you trust
by Rob Levesque, Published: April 14, 2014
Felice Kirsh was recently quoted in an article on AdvocateDaily.com. In "Choose a power of attorney you trust", Ms Kirsh explains that the first step in avoiding power of attorney fraud lies in who you appoint to take on the role. Continue reading here.
Elizabeth Bozek chairs seminar on the Consent and Capacity Board
by Rob Levesque, Published: February 26, 2014
On February 25, 2014, Elizabeth Bozek chaired the a seminar entitled "Backgrounder on the Consent and Capacity Board", which was part of the Ontario Bar Association's Trusts and Estates Passport Series. Topics covered included:the role of the Consent and Capacity Board ("CCB"); the type of cases that appear before the CCB; tips on advocacy before the CCB, including how files are referred; and a review of recent decisions from the CCB, including the highly anticipated Rassouli decision from the Supreme Court of Canada.
Consider whether a passing of accounts is worth it
by Rob Levesque, Published: February 04, 2014
Felice Kirsh was recently quoted in an article on AdvocateDaily.com. In "Consider whether a passing of accounts is worth it", Ms Kirsh emphasizes that beneficiaries of an estate should take time to consider, from a monetary point of view, what’s at stake before insisting on a passing of accounts. Continue reading here.
Best Lawyers for 2014
by Rob Levesque, Published: February 01, 2014
Brian A. Schnurr, Felice C. Kirsh and Jordan D. Oelbaum were recently recognized by their peers as three of the Best Lawyers in Canada for the year 2014 in the "Best Lawyers in Canada" survey for the specialty area of Trusts and Estates.
When estate litigation gets tense, lawyers must stay cool
by Rob Levesque, Published: December 11, 2013
Felice Kirsh was recently quoted in an article on AdvocateDaily.com. In "When estate litigation gets tense, lawyers must stay cool", Ms. Kirsh explains that when an estate litigation scenario becomes heated or tense, it is incumbent upon the lawyer to remain calm and level-headed.
“The vast majority of cases are highly emotional because you’re dealing with family members. Family relationships are complex – they’ve lasted for many, many years,” says Kirsh. “There might be built-up tensions, grudges or jealousies that manifest themselves in this last battle over someone’s estate.” Continue reading here.
Bar Admissions Fall 2013
by Rob Levesque, Published: October 29, 2013
Sandra Schnurr will be instructing the Wills/Estates/Trusts Bar Exam Prep Course offered by the "Centre for the Legal Profession" and the "Internationally Trained Lawyers Program" at the University of Toronto, Faculty of Law. The Wills/Estates/Trusts course will be offered on Monday, November 11, 2013 at the University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, from 5:30 - 10:00pm. The full schedule can be found here, and instructor biographies are found here.
Brian Schnurr, Felice Kirsh and Jordan Oelbaum named to Best Lawyers 2013
by Robin Spurr, Published: December 20, 2012
Brian A. Schnurr, Felice C. Kirsh and Jordan D. Oelbaum were recently recognized by their peers as three of the Best Lawyers in Canada for the year 2013 in the "Best Lawyers in Canada" survey for the specialty area of Trusts and Estates.
OBA Estates and Trusts Dinner
by Jovan Cvejic, Published: May 30, 2012
Last night, the Ontario Bar Association hosted the annual Estates and Trusts Awards Dinner. The Honourable Madam Justice Greer was the recipient of the OBA Award for Trusts and Excellence in Trusts and Estates. In her acceptance speech, Justice Greer inspired the attendees with her thoughts, and asked everyone to do the following: be brief in submissions in court; be a mentor to those more junior than you; and be kind.
Schnurr Kirsh Oelbaum Tator LLP was a Gold Sponsor of the event, which was held at the Distillery District in Toronto.
Trust Company Best Practices
by Rob Levesque, Published: January 26, 2012
On January 24, 2012, Felice Kirsh made a presentation on "Trust Company Best Practicies - How to Manage Client Expectations & Reduce Risk" at CIBC Trust.
Brian Schnurr and Felice Kirsh named to Best Lawyers 2012
by Robin Spurr, Published: September 28, 2011
Brian A. Schnurr and Felice C. Kirsh were recently recognized by their peers as two of the Best Lawyers in Canada for the year 2012 in the "Best Lawyers in Canada" survey for the specialty area of Trusts and Estates.
Best Lawyers Awards Brian A. Schnurr 2011 Lawyer of the Year, Trust and Estates - Toronto
by Robin Spurr, Published: April 23, 2010
Brian A. Schnurr has been designated as 2011 Best Lawyers, Trust and Estates - Toronto. Only a single lawyer in each practice area is awarded this honour.
Recent Posts
- Estate Litigation: Using Technology to Adapt
- Suspension of Limitation Periods and Statutory Deadlines Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
- The Courts and COVID-19
- Virtual Witnessing of Wills
- We are open during COVID 19 pandemic
- Felice Kirsh: Not every issue is worthy of a passing of accounts
- Felice Kirsh discusses the importance of record-keeping by estate trustees
- Sender Tator on Dependant Support cases and "Egregious Conduct"
- Improper Conduct and Dependant Support
- Felice Kirsh on why DIY wills are a recipe for disaster
- Felice Kirsh, Jordan Oelbaum, and Sender Tator named to Best Lawyers 2020
- Felice Kirsh discusses how lawyers should prepare their clients for mediation
- Felice Kirsh discusses the benefits of evaluative mediators
- Felice Kirsh on "Is my estate dispute suited for mediation?"
- Felice Kirsh discusses the benefits of mediating estate disputes
- Presentation at the MCBNA
- Top 10 Wills, Trusts and Estates Boutique
- No Two-Year Limitation Period for Passing of Accounts
- Limitation Period on a Will Challenge: Shannon v. Hrabovsky
- Make a Will Month
- Felice Kirsh discusses the perils of finding heirs
- The partners at SKOT LLP are Lexpert-ranked
- Probate and Privacy
- Buzz Aldrin Guardianship Dispute & the Importance of Planning for Incapacity
- The expensive consequences of being unreasonable in estate litigation
- Legally Valid Gifts
- Powers of Attorney - Common Myths
- Costs in Estate Litigation
- Capacity to reconcile or divorce
- What’s the “issue” with not updating your will?
- Top 5 Wills, Trusts and Estates Boutiques in Canada
- Mutual Wills v. Mirror Wills
- Costs in Will Challenge Litigation
- Estate Planning - Digital Assets
- 2016 Amendments to the Income Tax Act – Graduated Rate Estates and Qualified Disability Trusts
- Capacity to Enter into Contracts
- Court of Appeal overturns "racist will" decision
- Best Lawyers
- Costs Award Against Power of Attorney Personally
- Applications and Actions: dismissal for delay
- Schnurr Kirsh Oelbaum Tator LLP is heading east!
- Spence v. BMO Trust Company: the case of the racist father
- Top 5 Wills, Trusts and Estates Firms in Canada
- Quinn v. Carrigan: "No litigation outcome is inevitable"
- What you need to know before starting a will challenge: Leibel v. Leibel
- Do the claims of dependants have priority over the claims of other creditors?
- Estate Administration and Automatic Vesting
- Elizabeth Bozek to Chair OBA program "Complex Passing of Accounts"
- Jordan Oelbaum speaks about the discovery process at Osgoode Hall Law School
- Felice Kirsh speaks to financial advisors about best practices
- Best Lawyers for 2015
- Felice Kirsh to chair conference at Osgoode Hall Law School
- Parents have testamentary freedom
- Pro Bono Students Canada's Wills Project
- Leading practitioners
- Choose a power of attorney you trust
- Elizabeth Bozek chairs seminar on the Consent and Capacity Board
- Consider whether a passing of accounts is worth it
- Best Lawyers for 2014
- When estate litigation gets tense, lawyers must stay cool
- Bar Admissions Fall 2013
- Brian Schnurr, Felice Kirsh and Jordan Oelbaum named to Best Lawyers 2013
- OBA Estates and Trusts Dinner
- Trust Company Best Practices
- Brian Schnurr and Felice Kirsh named to Best Lawyers 2012
- Best Lawyers Awards Brian A. Schnurr 2011 Lawyer of the Year, Trust and Estates - Toronto
Tags
- "issue"
- 2017 onsc 2704
- 2018 onsc 6593
- accounts
- advocatedaily
- application for orders and directions
- armitage v. the salvation army
- as estate trustee of the estate of jadwiga koziarski v jesse sullivan
- as estate trustee of the estate of jadwiga koziarski v jesse sullivan 2017 onsc 2704
- attorney
- automatic vesting
- bad faith
- beneficiaries
- best lawyers
- best lawyers award
- boutique law firm
- bowmanville
- brian schnurr
- c. c.12
- c. s.26
- canada lawyer magazine
- canadian lawyer
- canadian lawyer magazine
- capacity
- case comment
- cheque
- children born outside of marriage
- children's law reform act
- children’s law reform act
- community engagement
- compensation
- conference
- conferences
- consent and capacity board
- contract law
- corona
- coronavirus
- corporate trustee
- costs
- court
- courts
- covid
- covid 19
- covid-19
- creditors
- creditors' relief act
- depandant
- dependant support
- dependants
- digital assets
- discoverability
- discovery
- dishonesty
- donee
- doner
- elizabeth bozek
- emergency
- emergency order
- equalization
- estate
- estate administration
- estate litigation
- estate planning
- estate trustee
- estate trustees
- estates
- estates administration act
- estates and trusts summit
- estates and trusts toronto
- estates boutique
- estates list
- executor
- executors
- felice kirsh
- fiduciary
- fiduciary duty
- financial advisors
- fraud
- gifts
- graduated rate estate
- guardianship
- heirs
- henry koziarski
- husband
- incapable
- incapacity
- income tax act
- inheritance
- inter vivos
- intestacy
- issue
- jordan oelbaum
- leading lawyers
- leibel v. leibel
- lexpert
- limitation
- limitation period
- limitations act
- litigation
- make a will month
- mcbna; presentation; estates
- mediation
- mirror wills
- misappropriation
- misconduct
- mortgage
- mutual wills
- ontario bar association
- osgoode hall
- pandemic
- passing of accounts
- poa
- power of attorney
- powers of attorney
- privacy
- probate
- public policy
- qualified disability trust
- r.s.o. 1990
- rob levesque
- sandra schnurr
- sender tator
- shannon v. hrabovsky
- shnurr kirsh oelbaum tator
- shnurr kirsh oelbaum tator llp
- slra
- spouses
- substitute decisions act
- succession law reform act
- superior court
- superior court of justice of ontario
- support
- suspension
- tax
- tax planning
- testamentary capacity
- testator
- top 10
- top 5
- toronto
- trial
- trust and estates toronto
- trustee
- trusts
- trusts and estate toronto
- trusts and estates
- trusts and estates toronto
- virtual
- wall v. shaw
- wife
- will challenge
- will drafting
- will litigation
- wills
- wills and estates
- wills trusts and estates
- witnessing